One on white privilege:
http://youtu.be/Wf9QBnPK6Yg
And one on the NYPD's stop & frisk policy:
http://www.upworthy.com/meet-the-17-year-old-who-blew-the-lid-off-racial-profiling-with-his-ipod
I don't think "enjoy" is really the right sentiment, but, uh,
Be enlightened.
M.
The minidoc on the police department is fascinating, although I'm wondering about fact checking? Is that a terrible second reaction (after shock&horror, of course)?
Wednesday, October 17, 2012
What does it mean to be white?
Hey y'all,
A friend of my posted this on FB and I found it extremely interesting. I thought I'd share!!
http://blackgirldangerous.tumblr.com/post/33241021145/how-to-know-if-you-are-white
A friend of my posted this on FB and I found it extremely interesting. I thought I'd share!!
http://blackgirldangerous.tumblr.com/post/33241021145/how-to-know-if-you-are-white
Friday, October 12, 2012
Application time
In light of Professor Kumashiro's talk on the neoliberal education reforms sweeping that nation, what do you think of the entrepreneurship highlighted here?
Thursday, October 11, 2012
Widening what counts as the code of intelligence
I am also posting this to open up a thread and space for discussion about the candidates' stances on education.
Denver Public Schools Erases "Social Justice" Language from its Teacher Evaluation Rubric
I just came across this article via EdWeek's Twitter and thought: "What better example of the deeper implications of language in the education world?" The headline speaks for itself, but here's an excerpt from the article:
This raises some interesting questions. First, is "social justice education" the same thing as "viewing and analyzing information critically?" I can see arguments on both sides: the first being that one needs to think critically to agitate for social justice, the other being that one can think critically and come to different political conclusions about society's ills.
The other question I have is: was the "social justice" language suggested by the teachers themselves? If it was, isn't changing the language yet another top-down mandate of how teachers define and relate to their own work?
I want to know more details about what the Denver policy-makers mean when they say "social justice" - but what do y'all think? Were they smart to take away the "social justice" language away, or simply caving in on a political whim?
In response to complaints, the Denver district is revising language in its teacher-evaluation system that described a "distinguished" teacher as one who "encourages students to challenge and question the dominant culture" and "take social action to change/improve society or work for social justice," The Washington Times reports.
District and union officials both said the language didn't properly reflect the concept they were trying to convey: that the best teachers help students view and analyze information critically. They've updated the framework as a response, the newspaper reports.
This raises some interesting questions. First, is "social justice education" the same thing as "viewing and analyzing information critically?" I can see arguments on both sides: the first being that one needs to think critically to agitate for social justice, the other being that one can think critically and come to different political conclusions about society's ills.
The other question I have is: was the "social justice" language suggested by the teachers themselves? If it was, isn't changing the language yet another top-down mandate of how teachers define and relate to their own work?
I want to know more details about what the Denver policy-makers mean when they say "social justice" - but what do y'all think? Were they smart to take away the "social justice" language away, or simply caving in on a political whim?
Friday, October 5, 2012
Literature Circle Groups
Hello All - Everyone except one person got their first choice for the literature circles. Please order your books and be ready to start working with them on October 18th. I've noted where there are folks
The New Jim Crow (strongly recommend breaking this group into 2)
Yamira
Kat
Kamilah
Jamilah
Marina
Aleshia
Marcus
Autobiography of Malcolm X
Jeannine
Regine
Lily
Jianan
Harlem on our Minds
Mimi
Dan
Luis
Other People's Children
Tinyan
Sean
Anicia
Jessica H.
Emily
Mariela
The Dreamkeepers
Iesha
Ashley
Jessie Sofio
Hillary
Steven
The New Jim Crow (strongly recommend breaking this group into 2)
Yamira
Kat
Kamilah
Jamilah
Marina
Aleshia
Marcus
Autobiography of Malcolm X
Jeannine
Regine
Lily
Jianan
Harlem on our Minds
Mimi
Dan
Luis
Other People's Children
Tinyan
Sean
Anicia
Jessica H.
Emily
Mariela
The Dreamkeepers
Iesha
Ashley
Jessie Sofio
Hillary
Steven
Responses to Kumashiro and Picower
The Donovans represented in the talks at HGSE!
Both Drs. Kumashiro and Picower were greatly impressed with the questions that were posed to them; questions that lifted their game individually and collectively.
In this thread, please post any responses, comments, and/or questions you'd like the collective to think about. As much as possible, make connections to others' thoughts, so that we create a virtual conversation of sorts.
Both Drs. Kumashiro and Picower were greatly impressed with the questions that were posed to them; questions that lifted their game individually and collectively.
In this thread, please post any responses, comments, and/or questions you'd like the collective to think about. As much as possible, make connections to others' thoughts, so that we create a virtual conversation of sorts.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)